The Attack on Colorado’s TABOR and the Threat to Other States

January 9th, 2013 by admin Categories: Issue Papers, Publications, Revenue, TABOR, budget, constitution, initiative, petition process, spending, state, tax, taxes, taxpayer No Responses

A lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of Colorado’s Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights (TABOR) has dire implications that extend far beyond the boundaries of Colorado. The theory of the lawsuit can be used to void well-founded safeguards in the constitutions of almost all other states.

In Independence Issue Paper 12-2012, Professor Rob Natelson, II’s Senior Fellow in Constitutional Jurisprudence, debunked the lawsuit’s claim that TABOR violates the requirement that each state have a “republican form of government.” In this Issue Paper, Professor Natelson and Institute intern Zak Kessler demonstrate the practical implications of the lawsuit.

If the plaintiffs win, the result will be legal and practical chaos, not just in Colorado but across the country. This is because the theory of the lawsuit is that any fiscal restraints on a state legislature render that legislature less than “fully effective” and therefore “unrepublican.” Special interests can employ this theory to destroy well-founded and long-standing safeguards against legislative fiscal abuse. Furthermore, they can use the same theory to attack the voter initiative and referendum process, and other constitutional limits on the power of state politicians.

Are you better off than you were four years ago?

November 2nd, 2012 by Brian T. Schwartz Categories: Opinion Editorials, Publications No Responses

Published in the Boulder Daily Camera. Summary: Income is down. Unemployment is up. Net worth is down.

Do Citizen Votes on Taxes and Laws Violate the Constitution’s Requirement of a “Republican Form of Government?”

October 26th, 2012 by admin Categories: Issue Papers, Publications, constitution, federal, government, petition process No Responses

Opponents of popular participation in government have long argued that when a state constitution or legislature permits the people to vote on revenue measures and other laws, this puts the state out of compliance with the U.S. Constitution’s Guarantee Clause: the requirement at all states have a “Republican Form of Government.” Traditionally, their argument has been that the Constitution draws a sharp distinction between a republic and a democracy, and that citizen initiatives and referenda are too democratic to be republican. Recently, a group of plaintiffs sued in federal court, challenging Colorado’s Taxpayer Bill of Rights (TABOR) relying on a variation of this theory.

In this Issue Paper, Professor Rob Natelson, Senior Fellow in Constitutional Jurisprudence and the author of the most important scholarly article on the Guarantee Clause, sets the record straight. Marshaling evidence from Founding-Era sources and from the words of the Founders themselves, he shows that the phrase “Republican Form of Government” permits citizen lawmaking—and that, in fact, most of the governments on the Founders’ list of republics included far more citizen lawmaking than is permitted in Colorado or any other American state. He further shows that the principal purpose of the Guarantee Clause was not to restrict popular government, but to protect popular government by forestalling monarchy.

Boulder City Council says bars are responsible for drunk patrons

September 29th, 2012 by Brian T. Schwartz Categories: Opinion Editorials, Publications No Responses

Published in the Boulder Daily Camera: Contrary to the Council, business owners are not responsible for keeping customers sober and well-behaved. Nor is government responsible. That’s each person’s responsibility.

Boulder/Denver Grocery Bag Restrictions Would Trash our Liberties

August 26th, 2012 by Brian T. Schwartz Categories: Opinion Editorials, Publications No Responses

Published in the Boulder Daily Camera on July 11, 2012. The city’s reasons for bag restrictions collapse like a soggy paper bag.

Aurora theater shooting: Gun control (victim disarmament) an unwise response

August 2nd, 2012 by Brian T. Schwartz Categories: Opinion Editorials, Publications, guns No Responses

In the Boulder Daily Camera: Want safer theaters? Blogger Ari Armstrong suggests that theaters offer free tickets and popcorn to armed off-duty police officers, and publicize the policy.

Why medical care costs so much

July 15th, 2012 by Brian T. Schwartz Categories: Opinion Editorials, Publications, health No Responses

Published in the Boulder Daily Camera.

Privatizing library operations can save taxpayer dollars

July 15th, 2012 by Brian T. Schwartz Categories: Opinion Editorials, Publications No Responses

Published in the Boulder Daily Camera.

Don’t Ask the State to Confiscate Water Rights

June 15th, 2012 by admin Categories: Issue Papers, Publications, colorado, property rights, water One Response

In next November’s election, voters may be asked to destroy Colorado’s 160-year-old system of water rights. A pair of ballot proposals, for which signatures are currently being collected, would essentially confiscate the water rights of cities, water districts, farmers, and ranchers by making them subordinate to the whims of any Colorado citizen who complains to a court about their legal status.

Weapons Laws of the Russian Federation

June 12th, 2012 by admin Categories: Issue Papers, Publications, firearms, guns No Responses

The following is a translation into English of the weapons laws of the Russian Federation. The translation is not an official translation by the Russian government. Accordingly, if you intend to use or possess firearms in Russia, you should consult with a Russian Embassy or Consulate in order to ascertain the lawfulness of what you plan to do.